There are numerous sources of mining information on the internet, encompassing topics such as technical articles, analyst opinions, and company press releases. It can be overwhelming sometimes. Now if your main interest is just seeing company news releases in a timely manner then what is the best way to do this?
One way is to go to the individual company website and sign-up one their email list. This approach generally works well but it forces you to sign up on a myriad of websites if you intend to follow a lot of companies. There are alternatives however.
One option is to sign-up for a free account with a newswire service where you can select the specific companies that you want to follow and then will get emailed news releases as soon as they are disseminated. The nice thing here is that you can select mining companies, non-mining public companies, as well as entire industries. Here are a few that I personally make use of.
Since different companies may use different news release distributors, the three websites that I track are:
Marketwire: There you can create a “Hot Off the Wire” account and then select your companies of interest. You can also select entire industries to add to your company list.
CNW Group Ltd. Create an account there and search various companies to add to your “My Subscriptions” list.
Junior Mining News is another source to get general news updates via their daily newsletter, a screenshot is shown below. Their daily email gives a brief summary of events that happened recently and includes “Read More..” links if you want to read the entire press release. This website accesses some of the same news release distributors as mentioned above so there could be some repetition from time to time.
Using the services described above, it’s very easy to sign up for a lot of companies, too many companies in fact, and then get inundated with emails. We know that public companies need to keep the news flow active and some companies are very good at continually issuing news alerts. However by using the press release distribution websites you are consolidating your requests, thereby making it easier to control the amount of information you want to receive.
Feel free to share your method for tracking companies, whether using the same websites or something entirely different and better.
For those of you with a geotechnical background or have a general interest in learning about rock slides and slope failures, there is an interesting website and blog for you to follow. The website is hosted by the American Geophysical Union the world’s largest organization of Earth and space scientists. The blogs on their site are written by AGU staff along with contributions from collaborators and guest bloggers. Their website screenshot is shown below.
The independent bloggers have editorial freedom in the topics they choose to cover and their opinions are those of their authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the American Geophysical Union. This provides for some leeway on the discussions and the perspectives the writers wish to take.
One specific area they cover well in their Landslide Blog are the various occurrences of rock falls and landslides from any location around the globe. They will present commentary, images, and even videos of slope movements as they happen. Often they will provide some technical opinion on what possibly caused the failure event to occur. The Landslide Blog has a semi-regular email newsletter that will keep you updated on new stories as they happen.
The following links are a few examples of the type of discussion that they have on the website.
Here is a description of a small water dam failure in Greece.
Here is some video of the Samarco tailings runout in Brazil.
Here is some video of boulders raining down on some buses along the Karakorum Highway in Pakistan.
From time to time the Landslide Blog will examine mine slopes, tailings dams, and waste dump failures, however much of their information relates to natural earth or rock slopes along roads or in towns and cities. Some of their videos are quite fascinating, illustrating the forces behind some of earth’s natural erosion processes. Check it out for yourself.
My bottom line on all of this is that the less the mining industry is mentioned in the Landslide Blog, the better it is for all of us.
The mining industry must continually find ways to improve and modernize. The most likely avenue for improvement will be using new technologies as they become available. One of the new players on the scene is a start-up company called “MineSense Technologies Ltd.” They are a British Columbia company looking to improve ore extraction and recovery processes based on the sensing and sorting of low-grade ore (pre-concentration in other words). They hope their pre-concentration methods will improve mine economics by reducing the consumption of energy, water, and reagents.
It’s not entirely clear to me how developed their technology is, but MineSense is relying on a combination of ground-penetrating sensors with other sensor technology in order to measure and report the grade of ore in real time. Existing ore sorting technologies seem to focus on distinguishing mineralized material from gangue, but MineSense seems to be targeting using actual ore grades as the defining factor. They hope to be able to eventually integrate their technology into equipment such as shovels, scooptrams, conveyors, feeders, and transfer chutes.
More specifically their proprietary technology is based on High Frequency Electromagnetic Spectrometry and High Speed X-Ray Fluorescence sensors. Reportedly these can deliver better sensitivity and operate at high speeds. They plan to develop two distinct product lines; shovel-based systems; and conveyor belt-based systems.
Their ShovelSense system would be a real-time mineral telemetry and decision system and used for measurement of ore quality while material is being scooped into the dipper, then reporting the ore quality and type to the grade control/ore routing system, and then enabling real-time online ore/waste dispatch decisions. Additional features may include tramp metal and missing tooth detection.
Their belt conveyor systems (SortOre and BeltSense) will use high-speed multi-channel sensing to characterize conveyed ore and waste in real time, allowing grades and tonnages to be reported and allowing ore to be diverted to correct destinations based on the sensor responses. MineSense say that pilot units are operating at 20 tph and systems of up to 2000 tph are in the development stages. Ore sorting has been around for a long time, with companies like Tomra (www.tomra.com), but possibly the MineSense technical approach will be different.
My bottom line is that we should all keep an eye on the continued development of this technology, especially as MineSense completes larger field trials. Hopefully they will readily share the results with us since it will be critical for industry players to see more actual case study performance data on their website. I recognize that developing new technology will have its successes and failures. Setbacks should not necessarily be viewed as fatal flaws since it takes time to work out all the kinks. Hopefully after being able to fine tune their technology they can advance to their next stage which will be to convince the mining industry to adopt it.
P.S. Unfortunately it appears MineSense don’t have a newsletter sign-up form on their website to help us in following their progress.
I have often wondered if any of the junior gold producers has ever tried to model itself after a gold Exchange Traded Fund (“ETF”). This hybrid-model may be a way for companies to provide shareholders a way to partly leverage themselves to physical gold rather than leveraging solely to the performance of a mine. Let me explain further.
Consider two identical junior mining companies starting up a new mine. Each of their two projects is identical; 2 million gold ounces in the reserves with annual production of 200,000 ounces resulting in a 10 year mine life. On an annual basis, let’s assume their annual operating costs and debt repayments can be paid for by the revenue from selling 180,000 ounces of production. This would leave 20,000 gold ounces as “profit”. The question is what to do with those 20,000 ounces?
Company A sells their entire gold production each year. At $1200/oz, the 20,000 oz gold “profit” would yield $24 million. Income taxes would be paid on this and the remaining cash can be spent or saved. Companies may decide to spend more on head offices costs by adding more people, or they may spend some on exploration, or they could spend on an acquisition to grow the company. There are plenty of ways to use this extra money but returning it to shareholders as a dividend isn’t typically one of them. Now let’s jump forward several years; 8 years for example. Company A may have been successful on grassroots exploration and added to reserves but historically exploration odds are working against them. If they actually saved a portion of the annual profit in the bank, say $10M of the $24M, after 8 years they may have $80M in cash reserves.
Company B only sells 180,000 ounces of gold each year and puts the remaining 20,000 ounces into inventory in a vault. Their annual profit-loss statement shows breakeven status since their gold sales only cover their financial commitments and nothing more. In this scenario, after 8 years Company B would have 160,000 gold ounces in their vault, valued at $192 million at $1200 gold price.
If you’re an investor looking at both these companies in the latter stages of their mine life, which one would you rather invest in? Company A has 400,000 ounces remaining in mineral reserves and say $80M cash in the bank. Company B also has 400,000 ounces of mineral reserves and $192 million worth of gold in the vault. If I’m a gold bull investor and foresee a $1700/oz gold price, then to me Company B might theoretically have $272M in the vault. If I’m a super gold bug, then their inventory could be worth a lot more..theoretically.
I assume that the enterprise value of Company A would be based on its remaining reserves at some $/oz factor plus its cash in the bank. Company B could be valued the same way plus its gold inventory. So for me Company B may be a much better investment than Company A in the latter stages of its mine life. In fact Company B could still persist as an entity after the mine has shutdown simply as a “fund” that holds physical gold. If I am a gold investor, then Company B as an investment asset might be of more interest to me.
My bottom line is that it appears that most of the time companies sell their entire annual gold production to try to show profit on the annual income statement. Possibly this is to put some cash in the bank and to show “earning per share” to the analysts. My question is why not inventory the extra gold and wait for prices to rise if the company doesn’t really need the money or doesn’t want to gamble it on exploration or acquisitions? This concept wouldn’t be a model for all junior miners but might be suitable for a few companies to target certain gold investors. They could provide an alternative junior mining investment especially interesting in the final years of a mine life. Who wants to buy shares in a company who’s mine is nearly depleted? I might if they hold a lot of gold.
Have worked in the mining industry for over the last 30 years it is always interesting to see the herd mentality that exists and how we all can easily get caught up in fads. All it takes is a short term spike in a commodity price or a big discovery somewhere and then off we go running in that direction. It doesn’t matter the rationale driving the event, all we know is that we need to be there and our investors want to be there too.
Based on my experience, the fads that grab us can include specific commodities, locations, or technologies. The industry is very flexible in that regard. I’ll give a few examples below and you probably have more examples from your own experience.
It seems that as soon as there is a price spike or positive market narrative, any commodity can take a life of its own. The following are a few examples and when you think about them ask how many actually came into production or successful production.
Potash – a few years ago potash prices spiked and potash properties were all the fad no matter where they were located around the globe, be it Canada, Russia, Ethiopia, Thailand, Brazil, etc.
Lithium / Graphite – as soon as green technology started to be promoted in the news, miners couldn’t run fast enough to pick up the lithium properties, same idea hold for the graphite and vanadium and rare earth categories.
Uranium – years ago uranium prices spiked and Ur properties were hot everywhere.
Nickel; a spike in nickel caused a surge in nickel properties being it sulphide nickel, laterite nickel, or other forms.
Iron Ore – in conjunction with the Chinese construction boom, iron ore properties were hot around the globe, in high cost or low cost jurisdictions, it didn’t matter where the property was.
Diamonds – in conjunction with the first diamond discoveries in Canada, quickly diamond properties because hot, whether in the Canada or around the globe. If you couldn’t get a property in Canada’s boom area, anywhere else was fine.
China in general – whereby every base metal project was thought of as either a potential supplier to China or a potential acquisition for Chinese companies. As long as it could meet Chinese investor interest it was good.
We have all seen the staking rushes that occur when a world class prospect is discovered. I’m sure we can all recall getting the large claim maps (as shown below) with their multicolored graphics showing the patchwork of acquisitions around a discovery. PDAC was great for distributing these and they were well done and interesting to study.
Picking up properties in hot areas became the fad and share prices would move upwards regardless of whether there was any favorable geology on the property. Who recalls the following?
Voisey Bay; with a mad staking rush around there, with nothing else really paying off in the long run.
Saskatchewan; and the potash staking rush where almost every inch of the potash band was staked with only a couple of companies eventually moving forward and only one going into production.
Indonesia; during Bre-X people could get properties in Indonesia fast enough.
NWT; where the diamond property staking rush was crazing in the mid 1990’s.
Even mining or processing technology could get caught up in somewhat of a wave and become a fad for further study, a rationale often driven by suppliers or consultants. Who can recall…
Paste Tailings; with numerous conferences and consultants promoting thickened or paste tailings technology as the panacea leading to numerous studies related to thickening, pumping, and disposal.
Block Caving; whereby in order to deliver high tonnages at low cost, bulk underground mining was being promoted. Everyone wanted their underground project to be a low cost caving style operation.
High Pressure Grinding Rolls (HPGR); where process consultants would tout HPGR as the new replacement for conventional grinding mills. I’m not sure this technology has taken the industry by storm as they were hoping.
IPCC; whereby inpit crushing and conveying was being promoted in many articles and global conferences as the solution to operating cost pressures. I think implementation of IPCC technology isn’t as simple as envisioned.
Dot.com; in the early 2000’s many junior miners left exploration behind and transitioned to the dot.com boom, a fad with generally poor results.
Medical marijuana; seems to be the hopeful target for some junior miners today. Unfortunately there is only so much marijuana you can sell.
Pre-concentration; this seems to be a growing technology fad that may be gaining momentum, with a few consultants pushing for it to be studied more. This isn’t new technology and will have its benefits but a big stumbling block is how many deposits are actually suitable for its application.
My bottom line is that over the years it has been interesting to watch the mining industry react to events. Sometimes it seems like we’re passengers on a boat running from one side to other side and then back again. Unfortunately that doesn’t necessarily make for smooth sailing and can result in upset stomachs.
What’s the next fad? I don’t know but if you could predict it we can probably make a lot of money.